On Monday, July 20, 2015, The Texas
Tribune published an article titled First Disclosures Offer View of 2016
Texas Money Race. This article explains the flock of people already
heading for electoral funding. The author of this article pretty much calls out
people that need a lot of funding, and sheds a bad light on it. When looking at
campaigns and elections it is clear that money plays a huge role in who wins
and who loses. The person that spends less money on campaigning, usually the
incumbent, actually wins most of the time because this person is clearly not
threatened by the other candidate. Congressional incumbents have many
advantages over their challengers which, in turn, leads to a very high
percentage of re-election often called congressional stagnation. However, this
doesn’t mean that whoever spends less will win. Challengers must spend more
than the incumbents to even have a chance at winning congressional office,
which is why it is wrong to call these people out for simply trying to put their name out there.
No comments:
Post a Comment